Research Abstract II – 2007
Characterizing Genetic Susceptibility to Breast and Prostate Cancer
This
continuation of the Breast and Prostate Cancer and Hormone-Related Gene Variant
Study provides for follow-up and activities of the NCI Breast and Prostate
Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). The study includes the following 6 large
prospective cohorts: American Cancer Society Cancer Prevention Study-II (CPS-II);
European Prospective Investigation of Cancer (EPIC): four Harvard Cohorts — Physician's
Health Study (PHS), Nurses' Health Studies I and II (NHS and NHSII), Health
Professionals Follow-up Study (HPFS), and Women's Health Study (WHS); Multiethnic
Cohort (MEC); Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening
Trial, and Alpha-Tocopherol, Beta-Carotene (ATBC) Study.
This international
consortium was first funded in 2003 and over its first four years assessed
55 candidate genes in the steroid hormone metabolism and IGF pathways in
relation to risk for breast and prostate cancer, as well as single nucleotide
polymorphisms (SNPs) in 22 additional genes in these and other important
pathways that were not listed in the original grant application. In this
phase of the research project, resequencing and genotyping data on these
candidate genes were obtained, and tag-SNPs were selected in these genes.
These data are available to the research community on a public Web site.
Genotyping of these SNPs in more than 7,000 cases of breast cancer and more
than 8,500 cases of prostate cancer has been completed or is near completion
as of mid-2007. The investigators have established databases at two data
coordinating centers for breast cancer and prostate cancer. With the accrual
of additional cases by mid-2007, they expect that these databases can be
expanded to 14,000 cases of breast cancer, and 16,000 cases of prostate cancer.
Starting in 2005, NCI’s Cancer Genetic
Markers of Susceptibility (CGEMS) initiative, has been conducting genome-wide
association studies (GWAS) in two of the BPC3 studies (prostate cancer in
the PLCO study, and breast cancer in the NHS) with replication for SNPs highly
ranked in the scan in the other studies of the BPC3. An admixture GWAS for
prostate cancer was performed in the Multiethnic Cohort and identified an
important susceptibility locus at chromosome 8q24. Other GWASs are ongoing,
including a breast cancer scan using pooled DMAs in the Women's Health Initiative
(WHI), and a breast cancer scan at the University of Cambridge, England.
Infrastructure is now needed to rapidly verify findings in large independent
data sets, to determine the role of genetic determinants in important clinical
subtypes of these diseases, and to identify gene-environment interactions.
Specifically, this new study will expand the BPC3 to serve as a rapid verification
test set for SNPs identified in the scans other than the CGEMS scan, and
to examine gene-environment interactions in the SNPs identified in CGEMS
and other studies as being associated with breast and prostate cancer.
With
the completion of GWAS for breast cancer and prostate cancers in aggregate,
important questions remain that the BPC3 is uniquely positioned to answer.
Estrogen receptor negative (ER-) breast cancers have specific epidemiologic
characteristics and greater lethality, but the current generation of scans
is underpowered to discover gene variants associated with these tumors. Aggressive
forms of prostate cancer, characterized by extraprostatic extension (Stage
C/D) or high histologic grade (Gleason score 8+), differ epidemiologically
from the vastly more common indolent forms of prostate cancer and are of
the greatest clinical importance, but again the current scans are underpowered
to discover associated genetic determinants. No single study is likely to
have enough cases of these cancer subtypes to perform a GWAS. By pooling
cases across the BPC3 studies, the investigators can achieve adequate power
to discover genetic variation that gives rise to these important clinical
subtypes.
Projects developed within the BPC3 are fostering continuing interactions
between the genomic and epidemiologic research communities and are integrating
the rapid advances in genomic research into large-scale epidemiologic studies.
The ultimate goal is to provide the foundation for reducing t
|