Session 3: The New NIH Genetic Testing Registry: Peering Into the Black Box of Genetic Tests
Slide 1 of 35
The New NIH Genetic Testing Registry: Peering Into the Black Box of Genetic Tests
Public Health Genomics Interest Group Seminar Series
NCI Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences
February 15, 2012
Wendy Rubinstein, MD, PhD, FACP, FACMG
Senior Scientist, NIH/NLM/NCBI
Director, NIH Genetic Testing Registry
The following relationship(s) exist related to this presentation:
- No relationships to disclose.
Slide 2 of 35
Outline:
- Recognizing the black box is a problem, and deciding to do something about it
- Finding out what’s in the black box (GTR live demo)
- Thinking outside the box
Slide 3 of 35
The Continuum of Translation Research in Genomic Medicine: How Can We Accelerate the Appropriate Integration of Human Genome Discoveries Into Health Care and Disease Prevention?
T1: From Gene Discovery to Health Application
T2: From Health Application to Evidence-based Guideline
T3: From Guideline to Health Practice
T4: From Practice to Health Impact
Gene discovery → Genetic tests
Khoury MJ et al. Genetics in Medicine. 2007 Oct;9(10):665-74.
Slide 4 of 35
Some problems
- Pervasive belief that T1 = T4
- Manifest destiny of genetics and genomics
Slide 5 of 35
Some problems
Extrapolation from a single example to all of health care
[Image of two men debating with each other from podiums]
Ransohoff & Khoury v. Gulcher & Stefannson
Eur J Clin Invest 2010
Slide 6 of 35
Some problems
Extrapolation from a single example to all of health care, when disease prediction matches disease diagnosis
- Therefore, all predictions are true
- All opportunities to intervene are effective and lifesaving
- All individuals will rationally pursue avenues toward better health
- Numeracy and risk perception are ideal
- No potentially adverse effects need to be considered
- Every observed association will translate into better public health
Slide 7 of 35
Genetic test is a basic unit or 'analyte' of genomic medicine
- Subject of a study
- Component of a study
[Image of T1 to T4 research translation continuum]
Slide 8 of 35
Some more problems
- Information void
- How many genetic tests are clinically available?
Slide 9 of 35
How many genes? How many tests?
[Image of graph showing growth by year, from 1993-2011, of the number of diseases for which genetic testing is available against the number of laboratories].
Source of data is the Gene Tests Database from 2011.(www.genetests.org)
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/sites/GeneTests/
Slide 10 of 35
Some more problems
- Information void
- How many genetic tests are clinically available?
- How are these tests performed (methods)?
- What is the purpose?
- Are there health benefits?
- What is the evidence?
Slide 11 of 35
Yet more problems
- Which genes have clinically valid tests?
- Which conditions have clinical utility for genetic testing?
- Which variants are pathogenic and which are not?
Slide 12 of 35
Yet more problems
- Which genes have clinically valid tests?
- Which conditions have clinical utility for genetic testing?
- Which variants are pathogenic and which are not?
Thinking outside the box
Slide 13 of 35
One piece of the puzzle
Recognizing the black box is a problem, and deciding to do something about it
[Image of a puzzle with one missing piece]
Slide 14 of 35
The Call for a Test Registry
Currently, there are tests for more than 2,000 genetic conditions but no single source of information about these tests.
A 2008 Secretary's Advisory Committee on Genetics, Health, and Society report
recommended that HHS establish a test registry to increase the transparency of genetic testing.
Other policy and advocacy groups have called for a registry that includes tests across the risk continuum and comprehensive information to enable informed decision making regarding genetic testing.
Javitt G et al. Developing the blueprint for a genetic testing registry. Public Health Genomics. 2010;13(2):95-105.
Zonno K. Call for Action from Genetic Alliance. Registry of Genetic Tests: A Critical Stepping Stone to Improving the Genetic Testing System. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2009; 13(2): 153–154.
Slide 15 of 35
Clinical Genomics
- Need database anchored on tests, not diseases
- Must accommodate complex information
- Arrays
- Whole genome and whole exome tests
Slide 16 of 35
NIH Responds
NIH developed a voluntary genetic testing registry to:
- Encourage providers of genetic tests to enhance transparency by publicly sharing information about the availability and scientific basis of their tests;
- Provide an information resource for health care providers, researchers, and patients to locate laboratories that offer particular tests; and
- Facilitate research and new scientific discoveries.
Slide 17 of 35
GTR Development Steps
- March 18, 2010: NIH announcement to develop the GTR
- June-August 2010: RFI public comment period
- November 2, 2010: Public stakeholder meeting
- April 2011: Initiated Paperwork Act Reduction process
- January 18, 2012: 604 labs participating in GeneTests notified of plan to transition to the GTR. None opted out
- February 7, 2012: Soft launch of the GTR website. Tests transitioned from GeneTests to GTR, GTR navigation features, resource links integrated.
- Feb-March 2012: Open submission site pending approval by the Office of Management and Budget to collect information.
- Mid-2012: Realize full potential of the GTR as labs migrate and fully register GTR tests
Slide 18 of 35
Stakeholder Input
Input from diverse stakeholders (e.g., test developers, health care providers, industry) throughout GTR development
- 84 public comments from 3 Federal Register notices
- 17 public comments from public stakeholder meeting
- 95 comments through "Contact GTR"
- 19 meetings/teleconferences with stakeholder groups
- 3 meetings with other government agencies
- Feedback from presentations at 7 professional meetings
- 10 consultations with two clinical advisory groups
Slide 19 of 35
GTR Team
- NIH Office of the Director – Policy oversight
-
Jim Ostell, Ph.D.
Chief, NCBI Information Engineering Branch
Directs NCBI's suite of genome tools and resources: GenBank, dbSNP, dbGaP, RefSeq, PubMed, PubMed Central, etc. -
Wendy Rubinstein, MD, Ph.D.
GTR Director -
Donna Maglott, Ph.D.
Lead, Database development -
Jennifer Lee, Ph.D.
Lead, Web development -
Brandi Kattman, M.S., C.G.C.
Genetic counselor -
Adriana Malheiro, M.S.
Genetic counselor - Team of programmers, web developers, usability experts
Slide 20 of 35
GTR Advisory Groups
NCBI Medical Genetics Working Group:
- Christine Seidman, M.D.
- Leslie Biesecker, M.D.
- Wendy Chung, M.D., Ph.D.
- David S. Konecki, Ph.D.
- Robert Nussbaum, M.D.
- Charmaine D.M. Royal, Ph.D.
- Wendy R. Uhlmann, M.S.
- Marc S. Williams, M.D.
NIH Clinical Advisory Group:
- Ivona Aksentijevich, M.D.
- Leslie Biesecker, M.D.
- Thomas A. Fleisher, M.D.
- Daniela Gerhard, Ph.D.
- Katrina Gwinn, M.D.
- Stephen C. Groft, Pharm.D.
- Emily Harris, Ph.D.
- Suzanne Hart, Ph.D.
- Rochelle M. Long, Ph.D.
- Francis McMahon, M.D.
- Catherine McKeon, Ph.D.
- Winifred K. Rossi, M.A.
- Robert Shamburek, M.D.
- Bryan Traynor, M.D., M.M.Sc.
- Tiina Urv, Ph.D.
Slide 21 of 35
Phased Approach
Initial phase:
- Single-gene tests for heritable mutations, including pharmacogenetic tests
- Multiplex panels and arrays
Subsequent phases:
- Tests for somatic mutations (e.g., solid tumors, hematological malignancies)
- Direct-to-consumer tests
- Whole exome sequencing / whole genome sequencing
Slide 22 of 35
Data Elements
- Designed to collect the maximum amount of information while taking into consideration
- Burden on the submitters
- Input from a variety of stakeholders
- Distinctions between minimal, recommended, and optional fields
- Not included
- Test price
- Patents and licensing agreements
- Turn-around time
- Proprietary information
Slide 23 of 35
Overview of GTR Information
Test information:
- Intended use
- Target population
- Assay Limitations
- Methodology
- Analytical validity
- Clinical validity
- Clinical utility
- Ordering information
- Test credentials (e.g., FDA approved/cleared)
Laboratory information:
- Contact information
- Certification(s), license(s)
Additional resources:
- Other NLM resources and professional practice guidelines well integrated in the GTR
Slide 24 of 35
Intended Audience
- Initial target audience is health care providers
- GTR aims to serve a wider audience and to increase usability for
- Non-genetics health care providers
- Patients/consumers
Slide 25 of 35
Quality of Information
- Code of Conduct
Information that is accurate and not misleading
- Professional organization 'stamp of approval' invited
Slide 26 of 35
Code of Conduct
[Image of GRT Code of Conduct Webpage from NCBI at http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/docs/code/
]
Slide 27 of 35
Key features of GTR navigation
- Global search and tabbed searches
- Autocomplete dictionary
- Quickly limit disease search results
- Tests, OMIM, or GeneReviews available
- Quickly filter test results
- Condition/Phenotype
- Clinical or Research test
- Test purpose
- Test method
- Certifications e.g., NY CLEP-certified
- Laboratory Location
- Compare labs and their methodology menus
- Plan sequential testing in proband and family
Slide 28 of 35
Key features of GTR navigation
- Detailed Test pages with overview and tabs
- Discovery Panel – context-specific
- Clinical practice guidelines e.g., ACMG, EGAPP, CPIC
- Automated searches e.g., GeneReviews, OMIM, Orphanet, PubMed
- Locate a genetics professional
- ACMG, NSGC, GeneTests, NCI, ABMG, ABGC
- Consumer Resources
- Print information for your patient from Genetics Home Reference
- Access to NCBI's suite of molecular tools and resources
- Variation
- Login to MyNCBI to save preferences for displays and retrieval sets
- Stable accession and version history
Slide 29 of 35
Nomenclature and Standards
- Challenging!
- Many overlapping nomenclatures and varied conventions
- The GTR strongly endorses use of established standards
- GTR will continue GeneTests practice of using the HGNC standard for gene symbols and UniProt for protein names
- Whenever available, GTR will use disease names from SNOMED CT, and HGVS expressions for variations. Searches by alternate terms will continue.
- We use SNOMED CT - a standard vocabulary for use in Electronic Medical Records
- Support other standard health record keys such as ICD codes, and LOINC codes
- Forward-looking to direct connections between electronic health systems and the GTR
Slide 30 of 35
Finding out what's in the black box
Live demo of GTR
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gtr/
Slide 31 of 35
Solving some problems
Secondary (incidental) variants:
Which to disclose (and in which settings)?
∑ → Whole genome tests
Slide 32 of 35
Solving some problems
- Which genes have clinically valid tests?
Which conditions have clinical utility for genetic testing?
Slide 33 of 35
Solving some problems
- Which genes have clinically valid tests?
Which conditions have clinical utility for genetic testing? - Tests, genes, and variants in GTR
- Claims and evidence provided by test submitters
- Stable versioning, can reference unique tests and review as if an analyte
- Aggregate info per similar tests for professional group
- ∫ Integrate information by professional group
- ACMG workgroup taking on this task?
- GTR will display professional stamp of approval
Slide 34 of 35
Solving some problems
- Which variants are pathogenic and which are not?
Slide 35 of 35)
[Image of ClinVar graphic and tagline: “ClinVar aggregates information about sequence variation and its relationship to human health]
- ClinVar represents the relationship of genotype, phenotype, and clinical interpretation based on supporting evidence
- Aggregating information about medically important human variation
- Structured observations are recorded to facilitate aggregation, comparison, search, and re(evaluation)
- ClinVar is an archive, not an interpretation tool
- Layers of assertions: Confidence in any assertion is indicated as a range from a single source submission to practice guidelines
- Attribution: Sources are acknowledged, with gateways to publications and external databases
- Terminology consistent with community standards
- Unrestricted availability: Data can be downloaded and integrated into external databases and local analysis pipelines
- Will be a distinct web resource later this year
- Companion resource with Genetic Testing Registry